Project Development

Harris Manchester College Chapel


IMG_2833 ce (low res)Dedicated in 1893, the College Chapel originally had plain glass windows, but this was gradually replaced by the current stained glass between 1895 and 1899.  They are all by Edward Burne-Jones and William Morris, making the chapel the only room in Oxford to be lit entirely by Morris/Burne-Jones glass.  So complete is this décor that even the organ pipes were painted by Morris & Co..

The orientation of the chapel is at odds with tradition: it is normal for the chancel and communion table to be situated at the east end of a chapel or church, but HMC Chapel was built with these at the west end.  For simplicity, I will refer to the actual compass bearings in this post.  My initial visit coincided with extensive cleaning work to the exterior of the roadside college buildings.  As a result, the east end window was under protective wraps.  This will be something for another visit.

12 impressDCP_5735 ce lrive pre-Raphaelite windows illuminate the chapel with each being composed of multiple lights.  The west window, installed in 1895, was the first to be designed and is far to complex to handle as a single image.  On this initial visit, I selected a small percentage of the window – just two representative lights:

At the top is a beautiful rose consisting of a circle depicting the Nativity of Jesus (BJ 285), surrounded by six angles: an obvious choice for photographing, not least because it contains no support bars, making post-production more straightforward.
HMC - Rose - Final (low res)

Central to the west window is a light depicting Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd (BJ 399), in crimson, bearing a lamb.
HMC - Jesus - Final (low res)

Additionally, I photographed the second window, installed in 1896, depicting Generosity (BJ 398), in the person of St. Martin, dividing his cloak to shear with a beggar; and Courage (BJ 397), portrayed as a soldier, St. George, with shield and spear.

The complexity of design within St. Martin’s patterned cloak and armour was such that I failed to be able to remove all of the support bars – while I was able to edit out the 4th bar down and significant parts of the 1st and 3rd bars, 20+ hours of effort produced unsatisfactory results for the parts remaining, so the final image depicts the light complete with bars.

It is entirely coincidental that each of the lights photographed were designed by Burne-Jones.  On a subsequent visit, I must endeavour to capture one by Morris.

Project Development

The Chapel of St. Edmund


Possibly the smallest chapel in Oxford, St. Edmund Hall’s chapel was consecrated for use in 1682 and dedicated to St Edmund.  The stained glass windows were installed a couple of centuries later by Messrs Clayton and Bell.  Sadly, where photography is concerned, choice over stained glass windows was limited: much of the glass suffered from close proximity to other buildings or dense foliage, making it incredibly dark, or resulting in a mottled appearance.

DCP_8561 (low res)The east window was work of the famous artists and designers, Sir Edward Burne-Jones and William Morris, and was inserted in 1865. It is the earliest example in Oxford of their stained glass work. The arrangement of the window was designed by Philip Webb, who also designed the pattern work. Fortunately, the main light within the East Window (by Burne-Jones) was lit uniformly and lent itself to convenient shooting, as there was the full length of the nave to use.

The east window demonstrated very high contrast, with significant area proving difficult to resolve in anything more than black.  It is also a window that has not been cleaned recently, showing much build-up of dark grime.

St. Edmund Hall - Ecce Agnus Dei (cut out) UPDATED PNG (low res)

Crucifixion (Edward Burne-Jones, 1865) The Chapel of St. Edmund

Ecce Agnus Dei qui tollit peccata mundi
Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world!
John 1:29

Shot at 220mm, using the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens, at the now standard aperture of f/8.0, there was only a small amount of perspective distortion to correct in the final image.

Project Development

Harris Manchester College Chapel – revisited


My initial visit to The Chapel of Harris Manchester College saw the East Window shrouded in protective covers while cleaning work was taking place outside.  The chapel is not typically oriented, so the east window, in this instance, is located at the rear of the chapel.

Harris Manchester is undoubtedly the most welcoming college – I am always greeted like a long-lost friend by the Porter’s Lodge, and have been accommodated without any problem, allowed to get on with my work in the most beautiful surroundings.

While I endeavour to restrict myself to just a single stained-glass window (or light) from each chapel, I keep finding myself drawn back to this chapel, which is filled with stunning work by William Morris and Edward Burne-Jones.

The east window was undoubtedly worth my revisit… it is impressively large, and stunning!  Sadly, and in keeping with many chapels and churches, the five main lights are all backed by protective mesh, which although subtle and almost unnoticeable to the casual observer, creates an obvious and detracting element to any photograph, even when reduced to a thumbnail…

DCP_8660 (quick edit) (low res)

The quick edit of the entire east window, above, provides just a hint of the stunning colours and design.  However, for the development of this project, I focussed most of my efforts on the top third of the window, lavishly illustrated with angels and devoid of protective mesh.

East Rose - PNG (low res).png

Teaching the Ignorant (BJ237 Edward Burne-Jones, 1896) The Chapel of Harris Manchester College

It is always a pleasure, when working on roses, not to have to remove support bars!  As a result, the editing time was quick by comparison. The image was shot at 349mm, using the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens, at an aperture of f/8.0 and exposure times ranging from 1/30 s to 1/2 s.  However, I am unsure whether this image is best presented square or circular.  I committed to a square print of the west window, but rather like the appearance of this one cropped as a circle…

East Rose - cut out PNG (low res)

Project Development

Harris Manchester College Chapel – Angels


I have commented extensively on the stained glass of The Chapel of Harris Manchester College and in particular its East Window.  Having previously edited the rose ‘Teaching the Ignorant’ I was drawn to the selection of angels that that flank the rose.

I have yet to find a detailed guide to tracery in order to identify and name, appropriately, the various parts of a church window.  Notwithstanding, below are edits of these beautiful, yet subtle components of the window.  I have cropped each as a square to optimise their use on Instagram, but also because they might lend themselves to greetings card design.

HMC - Angel Left (low res)HMC - Angel Right (low res)HMC - DCP_8711 sq (low res)HMC - DCP_8691 sq (low res)HMC - DCP_8734 c qs (low res)

East Window tracery lights (BJ237 Edward Burne-Jones, 1896) The Chapel of Harris Manchester College

Project Development

Christ Church Cathedral – The Catherine Window


Catherine Windows postcard

The Catherine Window – postcard

The Catherine Window was the first I photographed on Wednesday.  Sadly this could not be captured appropriately in a single image as it was in part obscured by a sanctuary lamp hanging from the ceiling.

Designed by William Morris and executed by Edward Burne-Jones in 1878, it is also referred to as the Liddell Window, this features a central light of St. Catherine that was modelled upon the then dean’s daughter Edith Liddell (sister to Alice, the inspiration for Charles Dodgson’s work Alice in Wonderland).  St. Catherine is flanked on either side by angels: to the left representing Victory and to the right representing Sorrow.

I photographed separately each of the main lights as well as the three tracery lights that feature angels playing musical instruments.

All three of the tracery lights were heavily covered in cobwebs which added significant additional editing time.

For each of the three images below, 28 images were shot at 400mm using the Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens, at an aperture of f/8.0 and exposure times ranging from 1/500 s to 1.0 s.

Christ Church - Angel - pipe (low res)

Dominic Price (2019) The Catherine Window tracery light Angel (left) [Edward Burne-Jones, 1878 – Christ Church Cathedral]

Christ Church - Angel - cymbals (low res)

Dominic Price (2019) The Catherine Window tracery light Angel (right) [Edward Burne-Jones, 1878 – Christ Church Cathedral]

Christ Church - Angel - pipe 02 (low res)

Dominic Price (2019) The Catherine Window tracery light Angel (top) [Edward Burne-Jones, 1878 – Christ Church Cathedral]

I will tackle the more demanding main lights in a few days!

Project Development

Christ Church Cathedral – Vyner Memorial Window


Before a stained glass window is designed, preliminary sketches are produced.  The sketch below must be early in the process as it is significantly different from the Vyner Memorial Window in situ.

Cartoon - AN00310608_001_l

Edward Burne-Jones (1871) Preliminary sketch of the Vyner Memorial Window, Lady Chapel, Christ Church Cathedral, Oxford

This window shares a frustration with The Catherine Window: it is obscured in part, but this time by a suspended hoop chandelier. Once again, this precludes the straightforward capture in a single image. Additionally, three of the four lower panels has dense foliage behind them, dramatically darkening their appearance on such a bright day.

My gaze was drawn to the only well-lit lower panel which featured another incarnation of Eunice and Timothy (previously photographed at the Chapel of St. Nicholas).  Interestingly, this features a very rare example of Burne-Jones’ initials on the wall just behind Eunice.  Being at head height, this would require little or no correction for converging verticals and featuring just one support bar, post-production work would not be too demanding.

The completed image was composed from 12 originals shot at 85mm using the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM, set to f/8.0, with an exposure times ranging from 1/160 s to 1/13 s.

Christ Church - He set my feet on rock (low res)

Dominic Price (2019) Panel from Vyner Memorial Window depicting Timothy & Eunice [Edward Burne-Jones, 1871 – Christ Church Cathedral]

Shot at 400mm using the Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens, there is a dramatically different theme to all of the tracery lights when compared with the early preliminary sketch:

Christ Church tracery lights (2)

Dominic Price (2019) Tracery lights (right) from the Vyner Memorial Window [Edward Burne-Jones, 1871 – Christ Church Cathedral]

Christ Church tracery lights (1)

Dominic Price (2019) Tracery lights (left) from the Vyner Memorial Window [Edward Burne-Jones, 1871 – Christ Church Cathedral]

Project Development

Christ Church Cathedral – The Catherine Window Pt.2


Christ Church - St. Catherine Window - The Angel 'Victory' (low res)

Dominic Price (2019) The Catherine Window – The Angel ‘Victory’ [Edward Burne-Jones, 1878 – Christ Church Cathedral]

After a brief respite to focus upon the Peer Review Presentation, I refocused upon the Christ Church Cathedral archive.  While this light is the most striking of the three from The Catherine Window, the removal of the support bars, which cover some notable fine detail, was always going to increase the post-production time.

Typically I anticipate an hour of editing time for the removal of each individual support bar, but in this case it took over six hours to remove the four bars!

Before progressing further with the remaining two lights it seems sensible to revisit the cathedral in order to compare this image (and those of the three tracery light angels), since the lighting on the day was far from ideal and for the first time ever I also had to endure internal artificial illumination.  It concerns me in particular that the skin tones for this angel are notably different to those of the tracery lights, when logic would suggest that the skin tones should be fairly constant within a single window.

To produce this image, 15 photographs were taken at 241 mm using the Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM lens, at an aperture of f/8.0 and exposure times ranging from 1/10 s to 1/125 s.  As with all images photographed for my research project, it was taken using the Canon EOS 1Dx Mark II.

The photograph was taken perfectly head on, but at a slight angle (vertically) which necessitated a small amount of  distortion correction.  This is always applied as the final stage of editing, but for the purpose of the animated GIF below, I corrected and cropped one of the original images as well as the image prior to the removal of the support bars.

The Catherine Windows - Victory GIF.gif

Dominic Price (2019) The Catherine Window – The Angel ‘Victory’: animate GIF illustrating the editing process.

Project Development

Man vs. Machine – the merits of HDR software


In light of the nature of this research project, it may seem strange that today was the first time that I have ever tested HDR Exposure Merging within an image editing program.  The test piece is a stained glass window I had recently photographed at Christ Church Cathedral and the images here show a small segment of that panel.  The completed image of this panel (detailed HERE) required just over four hours of editing so I am interested to see what software can achieve in just a matter a moments:

Dominic Price (2019) Panel from Vyner Memorial Window depicting Timothy & Eunice [Edward Burne-Jones, 1871 – Christ Church Cathedral]

DCP_9772 (ec)

Edited by hand

DCP_9771_68_65_62_Detail (HDR crop).jpg

Software-based HDR editing

It is interesting to note that I have opted for slightly greater saturation of colours and higher contrast (no surprise there) – however, this is an image that I have yet to moderate against the original.  The one area in which the software falls down (arguably) is in its handling of the clames, with the lead being represented more three-dimensionally, whereas I have endeavoured to represent the image two dimensionally with the lead being rendered black.

The results are mightily impressive and for occasions when I require a quick, yet imposing solution for social media (or indeed for inclusion as a small part of a printed publication), this could provide a pleasingly simple solution.  Of course, the digital removal of support bars can only be done by hand and that will add one or more hours per bar to the process!